Wednesday, January 7th, 2009

Podcast Taking it to the Streets AP News Advanced Search Lotto Community Calendars Worship Directory iPod & iPhone Updated! Area Guide Gas Watch Local Stocks Select TV Listings News Alerts RSS Feeds Freshwater Controversy Sudoku Take the News Along
Sports High School Football Area Briefs AP Sports
Video Archive 2007 Video Archives 2008 Video Archives
Wednesday Listings Help Wanted Homes for Sale Public Notices Miscellaneous for Sale Cars for Sale The Unyellow Pages Real Estate New! Automobiles New! Place A Classified Ad
Subscribe On-line Report a Problem Vacation start/stop Delivery Rates News Stands
Classified Advertsing Print Specifications Web Specifications
Staff Directory Letter to the Editor Follow us on Twitter
January 2009 December November 2008 Archives 2007 Archives 2006 Archives Video Archive 2007 Video Archives 2008 Video Archives 2009 Obituaries 2008 Obituaries 2007 Obituaries 2006 Obituaries
2009 Obituaries 2008 Obituaries 2007 Obituaries 2006 Obituaries 2005 Obituaries 2004 Obituaries

Taking it to the Streets

Answer our streets questions here.

What is your opinion of the Freshwater controversy?

January 5th, 2009

Related Stories: Freshwater Controversy

What is your New Year’s resolution?

January 2nd, 2009

What are you looking forward to in 2009?

December 31st, 2008

What do you think was the biggest news story of 2008?

December 26th, 2008
year in review

Winners and losers

Year in Layoffs

Obituaries

Do you think dog owners should be solely responsible for funding the dog shelter?

December 20th, 2008

What do you think of President Bush’s automakers bailout plan?

December 19th, 2008

Text of President George W. Bush’s remarks delivered today at the White House on financial assistance to troubled auto makers:

Good morning.

For years, America’s automakers have faced serious challenges; burdensome costs, shrinking share of the market and declining profits. In recent months, the global financial crisis has made these challenges even more severe.

Now, some U.S. auto executives say that their companies are nearing collapse and that the only way they can buy time to restructure is with help from the federal government. It’s a difficult situation that involves fundamental questions about the proper role of government.

On the one hand, government has the responsibility not to undermine the private enterprise system. On the other hand, government has a responsibility to safeguard the broader health and stability of our economy.

Addressing the challenges in the auto industry requires us to balance these two responsibilities. If we were to allow the free market to take its course now, it would almost certainly lead to disorderly bankruptcy and liquidation for the automakers.

Under ordinary economic circumstances, I would say this is the price that failed companies must pay. And I would not favor intervening to prevent the automakers from going out of business. But these are not ordinary circumstances.

In the midst of a financial crisis and a recession, allowing the U.S. auto industry to collapse is not a responsible course of action. The question is how we can best give it a chance to succeed.

Some argue the wisest path is to allow the auto companies to reorganize through Chapter 11 provisions of our bankruptcy laws and provide federal loans to keep them operating while they try to restructure under the supervision of a bankruptcy court.

But given the current state of the auto industry and the economy, Chapter 11 is unlikely to work for American automakers at this time. American consumers understand why. If you hear that a car company is suddenly going into bankruptcy, you worry that parts and servicing will not be available and you question the value of your warranty.

With consumers hesitant to buy new cars from struggling automakers, it would be more difficult for auto companies to recover. Additionally, the financial crisis brought the auto companies to the brink of bankruptcy much faster than they could have anticipated. And they have not made the legal and financial preparations necessary to carry out an orderly bankruptcy proceeding that could lead to a successful restructuring.

The convergence of these factors means there is too great a risk that bankruptcy now would lead to a disorderly liquidation of American auto companies. My economic advisers believe that such a collapse would deal an unacceptably painful blow to hardworking Americans far beyond the auto industry. It would worsen a weak job market and exacerbate the financial crisis. It could send our suffering economy into a deeper and longer recession.

And it would leave the next president to confront the demise of a major American industry in his first days of office.

The more responsible option is to give the auto companies an incentive to restructure outside of bankruptcy and a brief window in which to do it. And that is why my administration worked with Congress on a bill to provide automakers with loans to stave off bankruptcy while they develop plans for viability.

This legislation earned bipartisan support from majorities in both houses of Congress. Unfortunately, despite extensive debate and agreement that we should prevent disorderly bankruptcies in the American auto industry, Congress was unable to get a bill to my desk before adjourning this year.

This means the only way to avoid a collapse of the U.S. auto industry is for the executive branch to step in. The American people want the auto companies to succeed and so do I.

So today I’m announcing that the federal government will grant loans to all the companies under conditions similar to those Congress considered last week. These loans will provide help in two ways. First, they will give automakers three months to put in place plans to restructure into viable companies which we believe they are capable of doing.

Second, if restructuring cannot be accomplished outside of bankruptcy, the loans will provide time for companies to make the legal and financial preparations necessary for an orderly Chapter 11 process that offers a better prospect of long-term success and gives consumer confidence that they can continue to buy American cars.

Because Congress failed to make funds available for these loans, the plan I’m announcing today will be drawn from the financial rescue package Congress approved earlier this fall. The terms of the loans will require auto companies to demonstrate how they would become viable.

They must pay back all their loans to the government and show that their firms can earn a profit and achieve a positive net worth. This restructuring will require meaningful concessions from all involved in the auto industry — management, labor unions, creditors, bond holders, dealers, and suppliers.

In particular, automakers must meet conditions that experts agree are necessary for long-term viability, including putting their retirement plans on a sustainable footing, persuading bond holders to convert their debt into capital that companies need to address immediate financial shortfalls, and making their compensation competitive with foreign automakers who have major operations in the United States.

If a company fails to come up with a viable plan by March 31st, it would be required to repay its federal loans. The automakers and unions must understand what is at stake and make hard decisions necessary to reform.

These conditions send a clear message to everyone involved in the future of American automakers. The time to make hard decisions to become viable is now. Or the only option will be bankruptcy.

The actions I’m announcing today represent a step that we wish were not necessary. But given the situation, it is the most effective and responsible way to address this challenge facing our nation. By giving the auto companies a chance to restructure, we will shield the American people from a harsh economic blow at a vulnerable time and we will give American workers an opportunity to show the world, once again, they can meet challenges with ingenuity and determination and bounce back from tough times and emerge stronger than before.

Thank you.

What is the most important thing on your Christmas tree?

December 15th, 2008

How do you feel about landlords being required to turn in names of their tenants to the city?

December 13th, 2008

Council, landlords agree on amended ordinance
Monday, Mount Vernon City Council passed legislation which would require landlords to file a report with the city income tax department, listing the names of their tenants. The ordinance was amended twice, after a series of meetings and discussions with members of the local Real Estate Investors Association.

Full Story

What are some of your family’s holiday traditions?

December 10th, 2008

Do you feel the Alternative Center is the right solution for no tolerance violators? Why or why not?

December 6th, 2008

save and share
  • Print this Page
  • Print this Page Print
  • Digg
  • Reddit
  • Yahoo
  • Google
  • Del.icio.us
  • NewsVine
  • Facebook
  • Technorati
  • Add to Mixx! Mixx
  • Twitter Tweet This!
  • BB code
  • HTML Code
  • Direct Link

Taking it to the Streets is proudly powered by WordPress
Entries (RSS) and Comments (RSS).