Comments on: Freshwater sanctions possible

By: John C. Davidson

John C. Davidson — Sat, 10 Jul 2010 19:22:09 +0000

I need a drink; Does anybody know where I might find some fresh water, my mouth is dry from screaming.

By: RBH

RBH — Sat, 10 Jul 2010 02:56:25 +0000

Sam is desperately trying to distract attention from the fact that Mansfield’s memorandum in opposition clearly shows that Freshwater lied under oath in the administrative hearing and Hamilton lied under oath (in an affidavit) to the federal judge in the civil suit due to start on July 26.

By: comeon

comeon — Sat, 10 Jul 2010 00:31:22 +0000

sam he did not quote the documents or discuss any settlement talks. Which is what the gag order states. He is NOT in violation. Maybe you should take some classes in law.

By: Sam Stickle

Sam Stickle — Fri, 09 Jul 2010 21:55:02 +0000

@ David

You seem to misunderstand the scope of the gag order.

Judge Frost stated in an order dated 7-1-10: ‚ÄúPlaintiffs‚Äô Motion to File Under Seal An Exhibit Containing Documents Subject to a Gag Order is GRANTED. Plaintiffs will manually file the exhibit with the Clerk.‚Äù

Mansfield included his summary of the contents of the documents in a publicly available memorandum.

By: David

David — Fri, 09 Jul 2010 18:27:22 +0000

Mr. Stickle, is generalizing the gag order. The attorney’s quotes and statement doesn’t violate the gag order which reads:

“Accordingly, the parties are hereby ORDERED to not disclose or to permit others to disclose any of the confidential settlement negotiations that have been or will be exchanged in this action.”

Attorney Mansfield isn’t in violation of any settlement discussions. You should keep the muckraking on your own blog and stop posting all over the internet your inaccurate article. You’re not a legal expert and you should seek advice before stating a lawyer is in violation.

If you’re going to be a professional blogger don’t be cavalier with other people and their profession.

By: Miriam St. Jean

Miriam St. Jean — Fri, 09 Jul 2010 16:40:28 +0000

Freshwater and his attorney are “toast” as far as the federal lawsuit goes. Good grief, the handwriting is on the wall in big, bold print.

The only question in my mind is when criminal charges will be brought for perjury and obstruction against both, and when the Ohio Supreme Court Disciplinary Council will be called upon to take action against Hamilton.

Fruitcakes.

“Lying for Jesus”

What a crock.

By: M Baker

M Baker — Fri, 09 Jul 2010 16:23:52 +0000

I made a mistake, it should have read “Accountablity in the Media” The rest of my comment stands.

By: M Baker

M Baker — Fri, 09 Jul 2010 16:22:02 +0000

What is the website “Accountability of the Media”? The media is only accountable to thier readers, noone else. If you don’t like what they say, find another source.

By: Sam Stickle

Sam Stickle — Fri, 09 Jul 2010 15:09:05 +0000

@ V Fitzgerald and comeon

Mansfield included his summary, in a publicly available memorandum, of documents subject to a gag order.

By: my2centsworth

my2centsworth — Fri, 09 Jul 2010 12:27:29 +0000

I think we should ALL be tarred & feathered for reading anything about the Freshwater case. This nut was fired & deserved it! Thats all I’m going to say because I’ve had it up to my eyeballs with this case!

Gotta go beat my face in for reading about John Freshwater.